Alépée, N., Tornier, C., Robert, C., et al. (2010). A catch-up validation study on reconstructed human epidermis (SkinEthic RHE) for full replacement of the Draize skin irritation test. Toxicol. In Vitro. 24, 257-266.
Basketter, D.A., York, M., McFadden, J.P. & Robinson, M.K. (2004). Determination of skin irritation potential in the human 4-h patch test. Contact Dermatitis. 51, 1-4.
Borlon, C., Godard, P., Eskes, C., et al. (2007). The usefulness of toxicogenomics for predicting acute skin irritation on in vitro reconstructed human epidermis. Toxicology. 241, 157-166.
Coquette, A., Berna, N., Vandenbosch, A., et al. (2003). Analysis of interleukin-1α (IL-1α) and interleukin-8 (IL-8) expression and release in in vitro reconstructed human epidermis for the prediction of in vivo skin irritation and/or sensitization. Toxicol. In Vitro. 17, 311-321.
Cotovio, J., Grandidier, M.H., Portes, P., et al. (2005). The in vitro skin irritation of chemicals: Optimisation of the EPISKIN prediction model within the framework of the ECVAM validation process. Altern. Lab Anim. 33, 329-349.
ECVAM. (2002). Local toxicity: Acute dermal and ocular effects. Altern. Lab. Anim. 30, Suppl. 1, 35-47.
ECVAM. (2005). Executive summary. Altern. Lab. Anim. 33, Suppl.1, 7-18.
El Ghalbzouri, A., Siamari, R., Willemze, R., & Ponec, M. (2008). Leiden reconstructed human epidermal model as a tool for the evaluation of the skin corrosion and irritation potential according to the ECVAM guidelines. Toxicol. In Vitro. 22, 1311-1320.
Fletcher, S.T., Baker, V.A., Fentem, J.H., et al. (2001). Gene expression analysis of EpiDerm following exposure to SLS using cDNA microarrays. Toxicol. In Vitro. 15, 393-398.
Fletcher, S.T. & Basketter, D.A. (2006). Proteomic analysis of the response of EpiDerm cultures to sodium lauryl sulphate. Toxicol. In Vitro. 20, 975-985.
Gibbs, S. (2009). In vitro irritation models and immune reactions. Skin Pharmacol. Physiol. 22, 103-113.
Gibbs, S., Vietsch, H., Meier, U. & Ponec, M. (2002). Effect of skin barrier competence on SLS and water-induced IL-1α expression. Exp. Dermatol. 11, 217-223.
Grindon, C., Combes, R., Cronin, M., et al. (2007). Integrated decision-tree testing strategies for skin corrosion and irritation with respect to the requirements of the EU REACH legislation. Altern. Lab. Anim. 35, 673-682.
Grindon, C., Combes, R., Cronin, M.T., et al. (2008). Integrated decision-tree testing strategies for skin corrosion and irritation with respect to the requirements of the EU REACH legislation. Altern. Lab. Anim. 36, Suppl 1, 65-74.
Hoffmann, J., Heisler, E., Karpinski, S., et al. (2005). Epidermal-skin-test 1,000 (EST-1,000)--a new reconstructed epidermis for in vitro skin corrosivity testing. Toxicol. In Vitro. 19, 925-929.
Hoffmann, S., Saliner, A.G., Patlewicz, G., et al. (2008). A feasibility study developing an integrated testing strategy assessing skin irritation potential of chemicals. Toxicol. Lett. 180, 9-20.
Hulzebos, E. & Gerner, I. (2010). Weight factors in an Integrated Testing Strategy using adjusted OECD principles for (Q)SARs and extended Klimisch codes to decide on skin irritation classification. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2010 May 12. [Epub ahead of print]. Available here.
Jacobs, J.J., Lehé, C.L., Cammans, K.D., et al. (2004). Assessment of contact allergens by dissociation of irritant and sensitizing properties. Toxicol. In Vitro. 18, 681-90.
Jirová, D., Kejlová, K., Bendová, H., et al. (2005). Phototoxicity of bituminous tars-correspondence between results of 3T3 NRU PT, 3D skin model and experimental human data. Toxicol. In Vitro. 19, 931-934.
Jírová, D., Basketter, D., Liebsch, M., et al. (2010). Comparison of human skin irritation patch test data with in vitro skin irritation assays and animal data. Contact Dermatitis. 62, 109-116.
Kandárová, H., Hayden, P., Klausner, M., et al. (2009). In vitro skin irritation testing: Improving the sensitivity of the EpiDerm skin irritation test protocol. Altern. Lab. Anim. 37, 671-689.
Katoh, M., Hamajima, F., Ogasawara, T. & Hata, K. (2009). Assessment of human epidermal model LabCyte EPI-MODEL for in vitro skin irritation testing according to European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM)-validated protocol. J. Toxicol. Sci. 34, 327-334.
Kidd, D.A., Johnson, M. & Clements, J. (2007). Development of an in vitro corrosion/irritation prediction assay using the EpiDerm skin model. Toxicol. In Vitro. 21, 1292-1297.
Koeper, L.M., Schulz, A., Ahr, H.J. & Vohr, H.W. (2007). In vitro differentiation of skin sensitizers by cell signaling pathways. Toxicology. 242, 144-152.
Lelièvre, D., Justine, P., Christiaens, F., et al. (2007). The EPISKIN phototoxicity assay (EPA): Development of an in vitro tiered strategy using 17 reference chemicals to predict phototoxic potency. Toxicol. In Vitro. 21, 977-995.
Macfarlane, M., Jones, P., Goebel, C., et al. (2009). A tiered approach to the use of alternatives to animal testing for the safety assessment of cosmetics: skin irritation. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 54, 188-196.
Mallampati, R., Patlolla, R.R., Agarwal, S., et al. (2010). Evaluation of EpiDerm full thickness-300 (EFT-300) as an in vitro model for skin irritation: studies on aliphatic hydrocarbons. Toxicol. In Vitro. 24, 669-676.
Netzlaff, F., Lehr, C.M., Wertz, P.W. & Schaefer, U.F. (2005). The human epidermis models EPISKIN, SkinEthic and EpiDerm: An evaluation of morphology and their suitability for testing phototoxicity, irritancy, corrosivity, and substance transport. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 60, 167-178.
Netzlaff, F., Kaca, M., Bock, U., et al. (2007). Permeability of the reconstructed human epidermis model EPISKIN in comparison to various human skin preparations. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 66, 127-134.
Niwa, M., Nagai, K., Oike, H. & Kobori, M. (2009). Evaluation of the skin irritation using a DNA microarray on a reconstructed human epidermal model. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 32, 203-208.
Ouwehand, K., Scheper, R.J., de Gruijl, T.D. & Gibbs, S. (2010). Epidermis-to-dermis migration of immature Langerhans cells upon topical irritant exposure is dependent on CCL2 and CCL5. Eur. J. Immunol. [2010 Epub ahead of print].
Poumay, Y. & Coquette, A. (2007). Modelling the human epidermis in vitro: Tools for basic and applied research. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 298, 361-369. Available here.
Robinson, M.K., Osborne, R. & Perkins, M.A. (2000). In vitro and human testing strategies for skin irritation. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 919, 192-204.
Robinson, M.K. & Perkins, M.A. (2002). A strategy for skin irritation testing. Am. J. Contact. Dermat. 13, 21-29.
Ryan, C.A., Gerberick, G.F., Gildea, L.A., et al. (2005). Interactions of contact allergens with dendritic cells: Opportunities and challenges for the development of novel approaches to hazard assessment. Toxicol. Sci. 88, 4-11.
Ryan, C.A., Kimber, I., Basketter, D.A., et al. (2007). Dendritic cells and skin sensitization: Biological roles and uses in hazard identification. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 221, 384-94.
Schäfer-Korting, M., Bock, U., Gamer, A., et al. (2006). Reconstructed human epidermis for skin absorption testing: Results of the German prevalidation study. Altern. Lab. Anim. 34, 283-294.
Schäfer-Korting, M., Bock, U., Diembeck, W., et al. (2008). The use of reconstructed human epidermis for skin absorption testing: Results of the validation study. Altern. Lab. Anim. 36, 161-187. Available here.
Spiekstra, S.W., Dos Santos, G.G., Scheper, R.J. & Gibbs, S. (2009). Potential method to determine irritant potency in vitro - Comparison of two reconstructed epidermal culture models with different barrier competency. Toxicol. In Vitro. 23, 349-355.
Spielmann, H., Hoffmann, S., Liebsch, M., et al. (2007). The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation: Report on the validity of the EPISKIN and EpiDerm assays and on the Skin Integrity Function Test. Altern. Lab. Anim. 35, 559-601.
Törmä, H., Geijer, S., Gester, T., et al. (2006). Variations in the mRNA expression of inflammatory mediators, markers of differentiation and lipid-metabolizing enzymes caused by sodium lauryl sulphate in cultured human keratinocytes. Toxicol. In Vitro. 20, 472-479.
Tornier, C., Amsellem, C., Fraissinette Ade, B. & Alépée, N. (2010). Assessment of the optimized SkinEthic Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) 42 bis skin irritation protocol over 39 test substances. Toxicol. In Vitro. 24, 245-256.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). (2009). Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS). Third Revised Edition. Part 3, Health Hazards; Chapter 3.2, Skin corrosion/irritation. Available here.
Wei, T., Geijer, S., Lindberg, M., et al. (2006). Detergents with different chemical properties induce variable degree of cytotoxicity and mRNA expression of lipid-metabolizing enzymes and differentiation markers in cultured keratinocytes. Toxicol. In Vitro. 20, 1387-1394.
Welss, T., Basketter, D.A., Schröder, K.R. (2004). In vitro skin irritation: Facts and future. State of the art review of mechanisms and models. Toxicol. In Vitro. 18, 231-243.
Williams, A.C. (2003). Structure and function of human skin. In: Transdermal and Topical Drug Delivery - From theory to clinical practice. Pharmaceutical Press. Chicago. Chapter available here.
Zuang, V., Alonso, M.-A., Botham, P.A., et al. (2005). Skin irritation and corrosion. Altern. Lab. Anim. 33, Suppl. 1, 35-46.
|
